In 1977, they launched a space probe called Voyager 1. It’s been travelling for 37 years, but it would take another 17,565 for it to travel a whole light year. The closest star to us is just over 4 light years away. The closest galaxy, Canis Major Dwarf, is 25,000 light years away. That means 400 million years travelling to the nearest galaxy.
So my short answer would be, only if we can learn to travel MUCH faster. But also remember, even if we travelled at the speed of light, it would still take 25,000 years to get to the nearest galaxy :O
Do you ever get the feeling we’re not meant to visit these places?
Well, just travelling to another star is a very long trip. Even if we could go at an average 30,000,000 metres/second (10% of the speed of light), it would take us 120 years to cover the 12 light years to the nearest potentially habitable exoplanet candidate (there are two orbiting around the star Tau Ceti that are in the habitable zone).
The nearest big galaxy is Andromeda. It is about 2,500,000 light years from us, so our 30,000,000 metres/second trip would take 25 million years. I don’t know about you, but I think I might get a bit bored on that trip.
Comments